forum.bitel.ru http://forum.bitel.ru/ |
|
Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. http://forum.bitel.ru/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6011 |
Страница 1 из 1 |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 18 окт 2011, 10:12 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Всем привет, сабж. Обновились до 5,2 словили глюк Код: 10-17/23:07:23 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-11] RadiusPacket - Error RADIUS packet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radiusListener-p-3-t-11] RadiusListenerWorker - java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 ru.bitel.bgbilling.common.BGException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusPacket.parse(RadiusPacket.java:346) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusPacket.parse(RadiusPacket.java:313) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.processPacket(RadiusListenerWorker.java:98) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.runImpl(RadiusListenerWorker.java:87) at ru.bitel.common.worker.WorkerTask.run(WorkerTask.java:74) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) at ru.bitel.common.worker.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:40) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusAttributeInfo.read(RadiusAttributeInfo.java:76) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusDictionary.parse(RadiusDictionary.java:517) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusDictionary.parseAttributes0(RadiusDictionary.java:607) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusDictionary.parseAttributes(RadiusDictionary.java:585) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusPacket.parse(RadiusPacket.java:340) ... 8 more 10-17/23:07:26 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-12] RadiusPacket - Error RADIUS packet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radiusListener-p-3-t-12] RadiusListenerWorker - java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 ru.bitel.bgbilling.common.BGException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusPacket.parse(RadiusPacket.java:346) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusPacket.parse(RadiusPacket.java:313) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.processPacket(RadiusListenerWorker.java:98) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.runImpl(RadiusListenerWorker.java:87) at ru.bitel.common.worker.WorkerTask.run(WorkerTask.java:74) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) at ru.bitel.common.worker.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:40) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusAttributeInfo.read(RadiusAttributeInfo.java:76) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusDictionary.parse(RadiusDictionary.java:517) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusDictionary.parseAttributes0(RadiusDictionary.java:607) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusDictionary.parseAttributes(RadiusDictionary.java:585) at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusPacket.parse(RadiusPacket.java:340) ... 8 more вот такая ересь в логах и соответственно авторизация не работает |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 18 окт 2011, 10:19 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Если же оставить версию 5.0 то авторизация работает, но на 200-300 абонентов, дальше начинает утекать память и перестает авторизировать. |
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 00:42 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Цитата: ru.bitel.bgbilling.common.BGException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 Исправлено |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 09:16 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Amir писал(а): Цитата: ru.bitel.bgbilling.common.BGException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: NAS-Identifier header.length=0 Исправлено Это исправлено, но воз и ныне там, теперь в логах следующее Код: 10-19/09:50:05 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] RadiusListenerWorker - REQUEST: Packet type: Access-Request Identifier: 147 Authenticator: {D6 46 07 A5 F4 5D 76 1B 72 2A F8 67 E7 1B C6 B6} Attributes: User-Name=test_tp1024 NAS-Identifier= NAS-IP-Address=10.1.19.161 Tunnel-Type={00 00 00 01} NAS-Port=1 Tunnel-Medium-Type={00 00 00 01} Tunnel-Client-Endpoint={31 39 32 2E 31 36 38 2E 31 36 2E 31 31} Service-Type=2 Tunnel-Server-Endpoint={31 39 32 2E 31 36 38 2E 31 36 2E 31} Framed-Protocol=1 Acct-Session-Id=9017645-L-1 NAS-Port-Id=em1 Message-Authenticator=�d6�Z�<�?��.�U�� NAS-Port-Type=5 Calling-Station-Id= Called-Station-Id= mpd-link=L-1 MS-CHAP2-Response=�y{� �(H���?�G ���� �����g��:�S�Y MS-CHAP-Challenge=�h�|��f�<���G 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - java.lang.ClassCastException: [B cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.info.IntegerInfo.wrapValue(IntegerInfo.java:1) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.tlv.Tlv.<init>(Tlv.java:36) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusAttribute.<init>(RadiusAttribute.java:39) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusAttribute.<init>(RadiusAttribute.java:51) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.MSUtils.addMppeKeys(MSUtils.java:268) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.MSUtils.checkMSChapV2Password(MSUtils.java:502) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.MSUtils.checkMSChapV2Password(MSUtils.java:432) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusUtils.checkPassword(RadiusUtils.java:545) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusSession.checkPassword(RadiusSession.java:119) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.AbstractRadiusProcessor.authenticationImpl(AbstractRadiusProcessor.java:380) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.modules.dialup.radius.DialUpRadiusProcessor.authenticationImpl(DialUpRadiusProcessor.java:589) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.modules.dialup.radius.DialUpRadiusProcessor.authenticationImpl(DialUpRadiusProcessor.java:1) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.AbstractRadiusProcessor.authentication(AbstractRadiusProcessor.java:198) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusSession.authentication(RadiusSession.java:114) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusSession.accessRequest(RadiusSession.java:92) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusProcessor.accessRequestImpl(RadiusProcessor.java:360) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.AbstractRadiusProcessor.accessRequestImpl(AbstractRadiusProcessor.java:182) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusProcessor.accessRequest(RadiusProcessor.java:347) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.accessRequest(RadiusListenerWorker.java:289) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.processPacket(RadiusListenerWorker.java:163) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.bgbilling.kernel.network.radius.RadiusListenerWorker.runImpl(RadiusListenerWorker.java:87) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.common.worker.WorkerTask.run(WorkerTask.java:74) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) 10-19/09:50:05 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] LoggingPrintStream - at ru.bitel.common.worker.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:40) 10-19/09:50:05 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] RadiusListenerWorker - RESPONSE: Packet type: Access-Reject Identifier: 147 Authenticator: {2B 41 45 FE 67 F0 62 9F 54 62 1F 5C 46 4B 11 B2} Attributes: Reply-Message=2 Message-Authenticator= MS-MPPE-Recv-Key=��3�L� �+Ӕ˴v?��Ԭ=� �Ih=1,� MS-MPPE-Send-Key=��WV�3�vR�z�Y&08pCJ�� 7� Ё MS-MPPE-Encryption-Types=4 MS-CHAP2-Success=?S=0B450BA23A0A26BD42A02FA8FCCE825AED837BF1 Process time auth: 75 У клиента так же 691, в логах NAS'а так же статус busy. |
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 12:59 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
У вас dictionary.xml из 5.2 или свой? Похоже что у вас в dictionary MS-MPPE-Encryption-Policy integer, а в том, что с 5.2 идет - octets, и при добавлении использовались octets. Выложили обновление, чтобы MS-MPPE-Encryption-Policy добавлялся в зависимости от того, что в dictionary. |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 14:59 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
словарь из архива, не свой. Истина уже где-то близко, теперь лог выглядит так Код: 10-19/15:58:48 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] RadiusListenerWorker - REQUEST:
Packet type: Access-Request Identifier: 133 Authenticator: {F6 56 BA 65 A1 C6 57 D6 13 CB 4F 40 1A D0 E6 A1} Attributes: User-Name=test_tp1024 NAS-Identifier= NAS-IP-Address=10.1.19.161 Tunnel-Type={00 00 00 01} NAS-Port=1 Tunnel-Medium-Type={00 00 00 01} Tunnel-Client-Endpoint={31 39 32 2E 31 36 38 2E 31 36 2E 31 30} Service-Type=2 Tunnel-Server-Endpoint={31 39 32 2E 31 36 38 2E 31 36 2E 31} Framed-Protocol=1 Acct-Session-Id=9039763-L-1 NAS-Port-Id=re1 Message-Authenticator=Wi�����iOE� NAS-Port-Type=5 Calling-Station-Id= Tunnel-Client-Auth-ID={6C 6F 63 61 6C} Called-Station-Id= mpd-link=L-1 MS-CHAP2-Response=��X�aW7rS���3J-��H���Q�ހM*ݖ�h�l?��� MS-CHAP-Challenge=�hl .�;��y U_ 10-19/15:58:48 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] DialUpNasConnection - Stop without start! 10-19/15:58:48 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-8] RadiusListenerWorker - RESPONSE: Packet type: Access-Accept Identifier: 133 Authenticator: {0C 67 5F 6F 9C 4E C5 85 2F 70 9A 21 01 C7 74 37} Attributes: Acct-Interim-Interval=10 Message-Authenticator= Service-Type=2 Framed-Protocol=1 Framed-IP-Address=1.1.1.1 mpd-filter=1#1=match dst net 2.2.2.2/21 or dst net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-filter=2#1=match src net 2.2.2.2/21 or src net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-limit=in#1=flt1 pass mpd-limit=in#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass mpd-limit=out#1=flt2 pass mpd-limit=out#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass MS-MPPE-Recv-Key=�P{>1/rMd� �t���c�i��`��5x_��{-� MS-MPPE-Send-Key=�I��������G��������e`v=fdR MS-MPPE-Encryption-Policy=1 MS-MPPE-Encryption-Types=4 MS-CHAP2-Success=?S=03FA2395B3379D2E628AF139C9129FFDD4E07A43 Process time auth: 25 10-19/15:58:48 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-9] RadiusListenerWorker - REQUEST: Packet type: Access-Request Identifier: 133 Authenticator: {F6 56 BA 65 A1 C6 57 D6 13 CB 4F 40 1A D0 E6 A1} Attributes: User-Name=test_tp1024 NAS-Identifier= NAS-IP-Address=10.1.19.161 Tunnel-Type={00 00 00 01} NAS-Port=1 Tunnel-Medium-Type={00 00 00 01} Tunnel-Client-Endpoint={31 39 32 2E 31 36 38 2E 31 36 2E 31 30} Service-Type=2 Tunnel-Server-Endpoint={31 39 32 2E 31 36 38 2E 31 36 2E 31} Framed-Protocol=1 Acct-Session-Id=9039763-L-1 NAS-Port-Id=re1 Message-Authenticator=����=! �E�e�P� NAS-Port-Type=5 Calling-Station-Id= Tunnel-Client-Auth-ID={6C 6F 63 61 6C} Called-Station-Id= mpd-link=L-1 MS-CHAP2-Response=��X�aW7rS���3J-��H���Q�ހM*ݖ�h�l?��� MS-CHAP-Challenge=�hl .�;��y U_ ^[[?1;2c10-19/15:58:48 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-9] DialUpNasConnection - Stop without start! 10-19/15:58:48 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-9] RadiusListenerWorker - RESPONSE: Packet type: Access-Accept Identifier: 133 Authenticator: {5D 87 09 E2 9B 75 F1 63 FE BA AE 05 32 1E 71 DA} Attributes: Acct-Interim-Interval=10 Message-Authenticator= Service-Type=2 Framed-Protocol=1 Framed-IP-Address=1.1.1.1 mpd-filter=1#1=match dst net 2.2.2.2/21 or dst net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-filter=2#1=match src net 2.2.2.2/21 or src net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-limit=in#1=flt1 pass mpd-limit=in#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass mpd-limit=out#1=flt2 pass mpd-limit=out#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass MS-MPPE-Recv-Key=����V"[�!P�HL�S)뤕*tA��� MS-MPPE-Send-Key=ЁuI���J� ̒�ܱD���C�o���� MS-MPPE-Encryption-Policy=1 MS-MPPE-Encryption-Types=4 MS-CHAP2-Success=?S=03FA2395B3379D2E628AF139C9129FFDD4E07A43 Process time auth: 56 |
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 15:16 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
У клиента ошибка или он подключается при этом? |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 15:23 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Так же 691... =( |
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 16:01 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
FessAectan писал(а): MS-MPPE-Recv-Key=����V"[�!P�HL�S)뤕*tA��� У вас точно радиус 5.2 без старых библиотек? Сейчас бинарные атрибуты в лог распечатываются как {01 02 03 04 ...}А если не MSCHAPv2, а CHAP или PAP? |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 16:15 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Заново скачал с ftp, обновил, лог выглядит вот так Авторизация не проходит, с pap/chap/ms-chap сейчас поиграюсь Поигрался, авторизация никак не проходит Код: Process time auth: 52
10-19/17:16:59 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-5] RadiusListenerWorker - REQUEST: Packet type: Access-Request Identifier: 70 Authenticator: {58 59 19 3C 50 66 2F B6 16 7E EF EA E3 31 DE C4} Attributes: User-Name=test_tp1024 NAS-Identifier= NAS-IP-Address=10.1.19.161 Tunnel-Type:0=1 NAS-Port=1 Tunnel-Medium-Type:0=1 Tunnel-Client-Endpoint=192.168.16.11 Service-Type=2 Tunnel-Server-Endpoint=192.168.16.1 Framed-Protocol=1 Acct-Session-Id=9044454-L-1 NAS-Port-Id=re1 Message-Authenticator={0D 65 DF 69 E2 A8 67 EF 4C F2 28 08 88 DF CF 7D} NAS-Port-Type=5 Calling-Station-Id= Called-Station-Id= mpd-link=L-1 MS-CHAP2-Response={01 00 35 31 6C DF 13 CA 71 C8 ED 20 4D CC 2B B4 9D FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 E7 48 92 1F E5 D3 B3 3C 96 FF 9D DD 1C CF 91 30 8A 41 5D 8A C1 E8 B5} MS-CHAP-Challenge={BB 1E 68 73 8F 0A BE 1F 63 94 FA 54 98 D3 C3 F2} 10-19/17:16:59 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-5] DialUpNasConnection - Stop without start! 10-19/17:16:59 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-5] RadiusListenerWorker - RESPONSE: Packet type: Access-Accept Identifier: 70 Authenticator: {64 AF 37 39 E4 B9 78 C4 AE 4E A1 5F 9E 0F B7 0A} Attributes: Acct-Interim-Interval=10 Message-Authenticator={00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00} Service-Type=2 Framed-Protocol=1 Framed-IP-Address=1.1.1.1 mpd-filter=1#1=match dst net 1.1.1.1/21 or dst net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-filter=2#1=match src net 1.1.1.1/21 or src net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-limit=in#1=flt1 pass mpd-limit=in#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass mpd-limit=out#1=flt2 pass mpd-limit=out#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass MS-MPPE-Recv-Key={A3 38 87 C0 CE 24 99 A2 7D D0 B4 5C B4 31 D1 0A FA AC B1 FC ED 7D D8 1D F6 AF 60 66 3E 16 49 91 53 22} MS-MPPE-Send-Key={D7 62 96 3B BF 82 FD B3 BC 92 55 98 92 AB 6F 8C 7E 7C 32 47 A3 11 D8 DF 38 BE 8E 8C F2 78 7A 69 26 E4} MS-MPPE-Encryption-Policy={00 00 00 01} MS-MPPE-Encryption-Types={00 00 00 04} MS-CHAP2-Success={3F 53 3D 37 46 37 33 39 39 32 31 43 42 31 30 35 32 37 35 33 45 36 43 38 42 41 32 35 46 39 43 43 33 45 42 38 42 33 43 45 46 37 31} Process time auth: 25 10-19/17:16:59 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-6] RadiusListenerWorker - REQUEST: Packet type: Access-Request Identifier: 70 Authenticator: {58 59 19 3C 50 66 2F B6 16 7E EF EA E3 31 DE C4} Attributes: User-Name=test_tp1024 NAS-Identifier= NAS-IP-Address=10.1.19.161 Tunnel-Type:0=1 NAS-Port=1 Tunnel-Medium-Type:0=1 Tunnel-Client-Endpoint=192.168.16.11 Service-Type=2 Tunnel-Server-Endpoint=192.168.16.1 Framed-Protocol=1 Acct-Session-Id=9044454-L-1 NAS-Port-Id=re1 Message-Authenticator={D8 D8 A5 ED 7A F2 6D 1B C4 A1 BB 2F CD 93 4F B4} NAS-Port-Type=5 Calling-Station-Id= Called-Station-Id= mpd-link=L-1 MS-CHAP2-Response={01 00 35 31 6C DF 13 CA 71 C8 ED 20 4D CC 2B B4 9D FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 E7 48 92 1F E5 D3 B3 3C 96 FF 9D DD 1C CF 91 30 8A 41 5D 8A C1 E8 B5} MS-CHAP-Challenge={BB 1E 68 73 8F 0A BE 1F 63 94 FA 54 98 D3 C3 F2} 10-19/17:16:59 ERROR [radiusListener-p-3-t-6] DialUpNasConnection - Stop without start! 10-19/17:16:59 INFO [radiusListener-p-3-t-6] RadiusListenerWorker - RESPONSE: Packet type: Access-Accept Identifier: 70 Authenticator: {0C AA 22 C9 52 42 D8 FF 40 BE E8 80 30 F6 C5 8F} Attributes: Acct-Interim-Interval=10 Message-Authenticator={00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00} Service-Type=2 Framed-Protocol=1 Framed-IP-Address=1.1.1.1 mpd-filter=1#1=match dst net 1.1.1.1 or dst net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-filter=2#1=match src net 1.1.1.1 or src net 10.8.25.0/24 mpd-limit=in#1=flt1 pass mpd-limit=in#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass mpd-limit=out#1=flt2 pass mpd-limit=out#2=all rate-limit 20480000 3840000 7680000 pass MS-MPPE-Recv-Key={BE EB D9 DE B0 84 2F AB 95 2B 3C 56 14 98 FF 80 DD 7F 00 FF A0 6A 1C 00 F5 10 EF AA 53 19 D5 22 88 50} MS-MPPE-Send-Key={AC FE 5F FF F4 5C 1E 56 0A D3 90 67 8B E4 90 89 0D 4F C8 4E 39 A9 D6 77 90 17 75 3E 8D 8B BC FB 3D AD} MS-MPPE-Encryption-Policy={00 00 00 01} MS-MPPE-Encryption-Types={00 00 00 04} MS-CHAP2-Success={3F 53 3D 37 46 37 33 39 39 32 31 43 42 31 30 35 32 37 35 33 45 36 43 38 42 41 32 35 46 39 43 43 33 45 42 38 42 33 43 45 46 37 31} Process time auth: 70 |
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 16:30 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
А в логах mpd можете посмотреть, почему ему Accept не нравится? Код MSCHAPv2 от 5.1 еще немного отличается, а CHAP и PAP - нет, и, насколько знаю, у нескольких клиентов dialup радиус 5.2 нормально работает сейчас. |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 16:34 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Лог с mpd5, это без дебага, сейчас включу дебаг выложу. Код: Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] Accepting PPTP connection
Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] Link: OPEN event Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Open event Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerStart Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] PPTP: attaching to peer's outgoing call Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] Link: UP event Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Up event Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM a4a3a462 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MP MRRU 2048 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MP SHORTSEQ Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] ENDPOINTDISC [802.1] 00 16 3e 00 0e b1 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #0 (Req-Sent) Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1400 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM 78256378 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] CALLBACK 6 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigRej #0 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] CALLBACK 6 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent) Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1400 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM 78256378 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigAck #1 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1400 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM 78256378 Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:13 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigReq #2 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM a4a3a462 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MP MRRU 2048 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MP SHORTSEQ Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] ENDPOINTDISC [802.1] 00 16 3e 00 0e b1 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Reject #2 (Ack-Sent) Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MP MRRU 2048 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MP SHORTSEQ Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] ENDPOINTDISC [802.1] 00 16 3e 00 0e b1 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigReq #3 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM a4a3a462 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Ack #3 (Ack-Sent) Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM a4a3a462 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: auth: peer wants nothing, I want CHAP Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: sending CHALLENGE #1 len: 21 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerUp Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Ident #2 (Opened) Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MESG: MSRASV5.10 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Ident #3 (Opened) Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] MESG: MSRAS-0-PHILKA Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: rec'd RESPONSE #1 len: 65 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] Name: "test_tp1024" Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: Trying RADIUS Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] RADIUS: Authenticating user 'test_tp1024' Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] RADIUS: rad_send_request for user 'test_tp1024' failed: No valid RADIUS responses received Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: RADIUS returned error Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: Trying INTERNAL Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: OpenConfFile: Can't open file '/usr/local/etc/mpd5/mpd.secret': No such file or directory Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: User "test_tp1024" not found in secret file Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: INTERNAL returned: failed Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: ran out of backends Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: Auth return status: failed Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: Reply message: E=691 R=0 M=Login incorrect Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: sending FAILURE #1 len: 31 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: authorization failed Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Opened --> Stopping Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendTerminateReq #4 Oct 19 17:33:15 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerDown Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Terminate Ack #4 (Stopping) Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Stopping --> Stopped Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerFinish Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] PPTP call terminated Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] Link: DOWN event Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Close event Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Down event Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] Link: SHUTDOWN event Oct 19 17:33:16 mpd: [L-1] Link: Shutdown |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 16:43 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Хотя... врядли с дебагом больше ясности стало Код: # cat /var/log/mpd.log
Oct 19 17:41:03 mpd: CONSOLE: Connect Oct 19 17:41:03 mpd: CONSOLE: Allocated new console session 0x2866a008 from 192.168.16.1 Oct 19 17:41:16 mpd: [] CONSOLE: admin: set debug 5 Oct 19 17:41:17 mpd: [] CONSOLE: admin: exit Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] Accepting PPTP connection Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] Link: OPEN event Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Open event Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerStart Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=5 addr=".:" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 96 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 64 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd mkpeer (2) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { type="tee" ourhook="l1" peerhook="left2right" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=5 addr="l1" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 32 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 66 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd 4 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args (32 bytes) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: 0000: 6d 70 64 31 35 31 34 2d 4c 2d 31 2d 6c 74 00 08 mpd1514-L-1-lt.. Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: 0010: be 00 00 00 55 cc ba 62 84 25 6d 28 00 00 00 00 ....U..b.%m(.... Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=5 addr="l1" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 67 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd 805306374 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args (0 bytes) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: RECEIVED RESPONSE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=16 addr="[df]:" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 72 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 1 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 67 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd nodeinfo (805306374) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { name="mpd1514-L-1-lt" type="tee" id=0xdf hooks=1 } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] PPTP: attaching to peer's outgoing call Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=8 addr="[df]:" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 96 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 69 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd mkpeer (2) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { type="pptpgre" ourhook="left" peerhook="session_b4ef" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=13 addr="[df]:.left" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 71 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd nodeinfo (805306374) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: RECEIVED RESPONSE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=16 addr="[e3]:" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 72 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 1 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 71 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd nodeinfo (805306374) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { type="pptpgre" id=0xe3 hooks=1 } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=13 addr="[df]:.left" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 96 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 74 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd mkpeer (2) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { type="ksocket" ourhook="lower" peerhook="inet/raw/gre" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=19 addr="[df]:.left.lower" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 12 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 76 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie KSOCKET (942710669) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd setopt (7) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { level=65535 name=4098 value=[ 1=0xc0 ] } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=19 addr="[df]:.left.lower" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 16 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 78 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie KSOCKET (942710669) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd bind (1) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args inet/192.168.16.1 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=19 addr="[df]:.left.lower" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 16 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 80 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie KSOCKET (942710669) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd connect (4) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args inet/192.168.16.11 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=13 addr="[df]:.left" } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: arglen 12 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: token 82 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cookie PPTPGRE (1082548365) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: cmd setconfig (1) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: netgraph: args { enabled=1 enableDelayedAck=1 cid=0xb4ef peerCid=0x8000 recvWin=64 } Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] Link: UP event Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Up event Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM e717ed94 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MP MRRU 2048 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MP SHORTSEQ Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] ENDPOINTDISC [802.1] 00 16 3e 00 0e b1 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #0 (Req-Sent) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1400 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM 40305503 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] CALLBACK 6 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigRej #0 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] CALLBACK 6 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent) Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1400 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM 40305503 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigAck #1 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1400 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM 40305503 Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:21 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigReq #2 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM e717ed94 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MP MRRU 2048 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MP SHORTSEQ Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] ENDPOINTDISC [802.1] 00 16 3e 00 0e b1 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Reject #2 (Ack-Sent) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MP MRRU 2048 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MP SHORTSEQ Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] ENDPOINTDISC [802.1] 00 16 3e 00 0e b1 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendConfigReq #3 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM e717ed94 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Configure Ack #3 (Ack-Sent) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] ACFCOMP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] PROTOCOMP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MRU 1500 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MAGICNUM e717ed94 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: auth: peer wants nothing, I want CHAP Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: sending CHALLENGE #1 len: 21 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerUp Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Ident #2 (Opened) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MESG: MSRASV5.10 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Ident #3 (Opened) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] MESG: MSRAS-0-PHILKA Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: rec'd RESPONSE #1 len: 65 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] Name: "test_tp1024" Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: Trying RADIUS Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] RADIUS: Authenticating user 'test_tp1024' Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] RADIUS: rad_send_request for user 'test_tp1024' failed: No valid RADIUS responses received Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: RADIUS returned error Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: Trying INTERNAL Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: OpenConfFile: Can't open file '/usr/local/etc/mpd5/mpd.secret': No such file or directory Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: User "test_tp1024" not found in secret file Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: INTERNAL returned: failed Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] AUTH: ran out of backends Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: Auth return status: failed Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: Reply message: E=691 R=0 M=Login incorrect Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] CHAP: sending FAILURE #1 len: 31 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: authorization failed Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Opened --> Stopping Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: SendTerminateReq #4 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerDown Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: rec'd Terminate Ack #4 (Stopping) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Stopping --> Stopped Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: LayerFinish Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=5 addr="l1" } Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: arglen 0 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: token 84 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: cmd 1 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: args (0 bytes) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] PPTP call terminated Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: SENDING MESSAGE: Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: SOCKADDR: { fam=32 len=8 addr="[e3]:" } Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: NG_MESG : Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: vers 8 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: arglen 0 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: flags 0 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: token 85 Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: cookie GENERIC (1137070366) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: cmd shutdown (1) Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: netgraph: args Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] Link: DOWN event Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Close event Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: Down event Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] Link: SHUTDOWN event Oct 19 17:41:23 mpd: [L-1] Link: Shutdown |
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 16:56 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
А радиус предыдущей версии какой Accept выдает? |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 17:07 ] | ||
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. | ||
Интересен так же лог tcpdump'а А именно этот момент Код: 10.1.20.202.radius > 10.1.19.161.18294: [bad udp cksum 4a37!] RADIUS, length: 511 Завтра выложу логи со старым сервером.
|
Автор: | Amir [ 19 окт 2011, 17:24 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
У вас freebsd? Возможно проблема в java, которая у вас стоит. На тестовых машинах такой ошибки не возникает, у других клиентов работает. Еще есть вариант, что MessageAuthenticator не правильный, но его совсем недавно на eap-ttls проверяли. |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 19 окт 2011, 19:49 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Отпишу о версиях и используемой ОС Код: root@bgbilling:/# /opt/java/bin/java -version
java version "1.6.0_29" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_29-b11) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.4-b02, mixed mode) root@bgbilling:/# uname -srm Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 |
Автор: | FessAectan [ 20 окт 2011, 11:08 ] |
Заголовок сообщения: | Re: Проблемы с версией BGRadiusDialup_5.2_199. |
Все ОК, авторизация на 5.2 проходит. Сделал обновление радиуса и сервера, после того как разработчики обновили/исправили версии, авторизацию на живых насах уже не проверял, на стенде не работала. Вернулся на стенде на 5.0 - тоже не работает, полез проверять - опечатался в секрете для наса тестового, исправил - радиус 5.2 заработал. |
Страница 1 из 1 | Часовой пояс: UTC + 5 часов [ Летнее время ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |